The University of Iowa

Tagged with "Center for Asian and Pacific Studies"

Phonotaxis
10/7/2013

CAPS to host public lecture and reading this week

The Center for Asian and Pacific Studies is hosting two events this week, both free and open to the public. Please join us for “Phonotaxis: Singing the Songs of Interlanguage or 吟歌丽诗 (A Manifesto of Sorts)” and "Chinese in Three Voices” (A reading in English and Chinese).
9/30/2013

CAPS talk Oct. 1 explores Classical Daoist Mediation

The Center for Asian and Pacific Studies would like to invite everyone to a public talk entitled "Classical Daoist Mediation: How and Why the Huainanzi is a Daoist Text," by Harold Roth, Professor of Religious Studies and East Asian Studies, Brown University. The talk will take place in the Religious Studies Atrium, 3rd floor, Gilmore Hall, on Tuesday, Oct. 1, 4-5:30 p.m.
Mo Yan
2/13/2013

Mo Yan's Nobel Prize: Resetting Chinese Literature

The controversy over awarding of the Nobel Prize for literature to PRC author Mo Yan has uncovered old and bitter debates about the relationship between politics and literature. However, Chinese society and contemporary Chinese literature have come a long way since the Cold War, when those debates first flared up, and the possibilities for Chinese literature today are unprecedented. In an upcoming public lecture, East Asian scholar Charles A. Laughlin will explain how Mo Yan and his generation have fundamentally changed the relationship between literature and politics in China, helping create a broader space for creativity and more vigorous engagement with world literature than ever before.
10/26/2012

CAPS lectures: Shaping public memory in Japan; Chinese in the Philippine Life

This talk examines the role that historical narrative plays in the public relations agenda of corporate Japan. Most member companies of Japan’s 20th-century keiretsu (corporate conglomerates that included Mitsubishi, Mitsui, and Sumitomo) regularly published official histories as a means of enhancing corporate prestige and to evade critical discussion of their past indiscretions. As a result, company history narratives often obscure more than they illuminate about the corporate subject.